In Person and Online (all sessions streamed)
April 2nd to 4th, 2027 // Pitchfest March 31st to April 2nd
Regent’s University

50 Kisses – View from the Script Pile by Steven Russell

With two weeks under our belts since the script stage of the 50 Kisses contest closed, it feels like a good time to give all entrants and LSWF community members a bit of lowdown about how the system works to identify our 50 scripts and where we are at with it now…

In total we had 1870 script submissions, with about 1000 coming in those last seven, busy days!!  In total, 11% (or 205 entries) were second scripts.  4.5% (or 85 entries) were dialogue free.  0.2% (4 entries) had one word in them and 0.25% (1 entry!) were in French.

Over the entire entry period there had been a rolling read of the scripts as they came in, which stepped up a gear after the entry deadline.  The 50 Kisses reading team are looking closely at every single script in the following ways…

In this first read, scripts were divided into a simple ‘pass’ or ‘consider’.  We wanted as many scripts as we could to make it to the ‘consider’ stage so kept the remit purposely loose.  The onus was on an interesting character placed with a script that felt like it had as full a story as possible, with a set up, a subversion and resolution.  Out of the 1870 scripts, 508 made it through to the second round.  Sadly, as much as we’d like to, given the volume of submissions we’re unable to provide feedback on those scripts that don’t make it to the second round.  Apologies!!

For those scripts that made the cut, all are being read for a second time, all by a different member of the 50 Kisses team.  With a more qualitative eye, we are examining and rating a number of the key aspects of each script.  Below is a small part of the brief given to each member of the team;

CHARACTERS; how interesting are the characters on show?  Do you root for them to succeed or fail by turns?
PLOT; are these characters given something to do and a way to do it?
SETTING; is the dynamic of the location interesting?  Does it feel like a memorable place to spend time, alongside the 49 other stories?
VISUALS; is there a chance for memorable visuals to help this story stand out?
MIMESIS; do you believe the world in which the story takes place?
NARRATIVE; are the words used (either as scene direction or dialogue) giving the characters speech or actions that reveal motivation, character and agenda?
VIABILITY; can the film be made, potentially, on a low- to no-budget basis?  Or with skills/technology a layperson can acquire, invent or improvise?
ORIGINALITY; compared to the other scripts you’ve read, does this feel like a distinctive story?
RANGE; how does the emotional intensity of the script start and finish, and how far much of a difference is there between these two points?
COMMENT; anything extra you want to say.

This is also this stage where we are looking at scripts in line with the bigger picture, a chance to consider each short script as part of the bigger whole that is 50 Kisses.  The 50 Kisses feature itself will do everything a feature needs to do, so is structured as such.  It will have high highs and low lows, each is contributed to by the tiny units of meaning represented by each two page story.  Much as the editing of a film ranges from faster or slower, or more or less extreme, to reflect where the characters are in the story, we’re keeping this in mind when looking at your 50 Kisses scripts.  This is a chance to highlight those scripts with a dynamic that ranges between two emotional poles, or is particularly polemic in one direction or another.  Altogether, this will allow for the fifty scripts to become one longer 100 page script with a rhythm that reflects more traditional feature narratives.

In order to provide the greatest range of choice and the highest quality we can for those enrolled in the filmmaking stage of the contest, the ratings of these 9 key factors will be used to give us an average score for each script.  We’ll rely on this average to help identify the top 50 from the 508 scripts that made it through to the second round.

Throughout, I’ll be keep fresh eyes on the top scripts from each reader, to be sure we’re not missing any scripts that will prove to be a strong addition to 50 Kisses.  Of course, as writing is very far from a mathematical pursuit and because we’ve got such a great team gathered, as the reading process winds up the entire reading team will get together in order to go over the 50 frontrunners.  Each individual member will have a chance to pitch any script they strongly feel should be in the top 50.

So from the first stage to the final read, I am confident all the above approaches will ensure we’re going to pull the cream of the crop from our 1870 scripts to form the written basis of 50 Kisses.  We’re looking forward to announcing those fifty kisses that are part of 50 Kisses in a few short weeks…

Steven Russell
50 Kisses script coordinator & development producer @ Love Me Not Scripts
http://www.facebook.com/lovesmenotfilms

12 Responses

  1. I love this post! Good on you for being so clear about the process! And you must be ready for a cuppa & a lie down, so I’ll understand if you don’t respond immediately. I’m very keen to know the gender proportions of the 1870 submissions, or 1870 minus the 205 second scripts. And the gender proportion of the people who submitted those second scripts. Often women don’t enter competitions in the same numbers as men, & I’d really like the details for my ongoing research. So if you have a minute… Thank you!

  2. Hi Marion,

    We will get this information together – although I confess it will take more than a minute as it will manual require us going through each entrant! Will let you know when we have gone through this and got a number.

    Hope this helps

    Gail

  3. Can’t wait to the final 50. I am suprised that only 85 entries were dialogue free, I was expecting most of the entries to be so. Great read, roll on the 31st.

  4. Thanks very much! (& GULP! yes I do know it takes more than a minute because have done similar counts too many times… So your willingness is much appreciated.)

  5. I love this post! Good on you for being so clear about the process! And you must be ready for a cuppa & a lie down, so I’ll understand if you don’t respond immediately. I’m very keen to know the gender proportions of the 1870 submissions, or 1870 minus the 205 second scripts. And the gender proportion of the people who submitted those second scripts. Often women don’t enter competitions in the same numbers as men, & I’d really like the details for my ongoing research. So if you have a minute… Thank you!

  6. Can’t wait to the final 50. I am suprised that only 85 entries were dialogue free, I was expecting most of the entries to be so. Great read, roll on the 31st.

  7. Thanks very much! (& GULP! yes I do know it takes more than a minute because have done similar counts too many times… So your willingness is much appreciated.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

Why I booked next year before I even left by Helen Tompson

Last year, I partnered with Chris Jones to add to the official LSF podcast. It’s now up and running, and it’s opened doors I didn’t even know were there. So I came back this year already knowing just being at LSF could change things. What I didn’t expect was quite how much when at the closing ceremony I put my money where my mouth is!

Read More »

Speakers and Pitchfest Execs Feedback 2026

‘I had an absolute ball at the festival this year. From the army of red-shirts to the positive, friendly vibes in the greenroom, and everything else in between, it was a real buzz to mingle with enthusiastic writers, pitching their best ideas, to such an interesting and wide variety of professionals. I met so many interesting people, had great conversations, and came away feeling excited and ignited about the writing industry. Thanks for having me!’ Eleanor Greene // Producer

Read More »

Feedback 2026

‘Incredible experience fantastic vibe and people speakers. Super interesting sessions!’ Carolin Farber / Screenwriter, Five Stars!

Read More »